Zen 4 Effectivity at 65 Watts
In Q3 of final yr, AMD launched the primary CPUs based mostly on its extremely anticipated Zen 4 structure. Not solely did their Ryzen 7000 components increase the bar by way of efficiency in contrast with the earlier Ryzen 5000 sequence, nevertheless it additionally gave start to AMD’s newest platform, AM5. A few of the most important advantages of Zen 4 and the AM5 platform embrace assist for PCIe 5.0, DDR5 reminiscence, and entry to the most recent and biggest of what is obtainable in controller units.
Whereas the competitors on the increased finish of the x86 processor market is a metaphorical firefight with heavy weaponry, AMD has struggled to supply customers on tighter budgets something to sink their tooth into. It is clear Zen 4 is a strong and extremely environment friendly structure, however with the added price of DDR5, discovering the entire parts to suit underneath tighter finances constraints with AM5 is not as straightforward because it as soon as was on AM4.
AMD has launched three new processors designed to supply customers on a finances one thing to get their cash’s value, with efficiency that make them favorable for customers searching for Zen 4 {hardware} however with out the hefty monetary outlay. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, and Ryzen 5 7600 processors all function the Zen 4 microarchitecture and include a TDP of simply 65 W, which makes them viable for all types of customers, reminiscent of fans searching for a extra reasonably priced entry-point onto the AM5 platform.
Of specific curiosity is AMD’s new entry-level providing for the Ryzen 7000 sequence: the Ryzen 5 7600, which provides six cores/twelve threads for entry-level builders seeking to construct a system with the entire options of AM5 and the Ryzen 7000 household, however at a way more reasonably priced value level. We’re all three of AMD’s new Ryzen 7000 65 W TDP processors to see how they stack up in opposition to the competitors, to see if AMD’s lower-powered, lower-priced non-X variants can supply something in the way in which of worth for customers. We additionally purpose to see if AMD’s 65 W TDP implementation can shine on TSMC’s 5 nm node course of with efficiency per watt effectivity that AMD claims is one of the best in the marketplace.
During the last yr, since AMD unveiled its Zen 4 core, we have revealed a number of column inches on the microarchitecture, Ryzen 7000 processors, and the AM5 platform. Beneath is an inventory of our detailed Raphael (Zen 4) and Ryzen 7000 protection:
Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, Ryzen 5 7600, 65 W TDP from $229
Specializing in the most recent 65 W-based Ryzen 7000 sequence processors, AMD is seeking to supply higher worth all through its sequence along with the varied value drops on its X-class Zen 4 chips throughout the board. The brand new Ryzen 7000 non-X sequence chips can be found throughout a number of configurations and value factors, a few of which present higher energy effectivity in opposition to earlier generations of its processors and the choice to return to bundling appropriate coolers for much more worth.
In distinction to AMDs prime X-series SKUs, which require competent cooling as a result of increased energy consumption and better thermal stress positioned on the IHS, the brand new 65 W fashions are designed with effectivity and efficiency per watt in thoughts. All of which is meant to make them (extra) viable choices for all sorts of system builders. To account for the decrease TDP in contrast with the X-series SKUs, AMD has lowered their clockspeed expectations for these new SKUs. The enhance clocks are nonetheless pretty excessive, reflecting what the silicon can do in lighter workloads; however the official base frequency clock speeds have been extra considerably reduce to be able to maintain the chips’ energy utilization underneath management in additional closely multi-threded situations.
AMD Ryzen 7000 Collection Line-Up | ||||||||
AnandTech | Cores Threads |
Base Freq |
Turbo Freq |
Reminiscence Help |
L3 Cache |
TDP | PPT | MSRP |
Ryzen 9 7950X | 16C / 32T | 4.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 64 MB | 170 W | 230 W | $699 |
Ryzen 9 7900X | 12C / 24T | 4.7 GHz | 5.6 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 64 MB | 170 W | 230 W | $549 |
Ryzen 9 7900 | 12C / 24T | 3.6 GHz | 5.4 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 64 MB | 65 W | 88 W | $429 |
Ryzen 7 7700X | 8C / 16T | 4.5 GHz | 5.4 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 32 MB | 105 W | 142 W | $399 |
Ryzen 7 7700 | 8C / 16T | 3.6 GHz | 5.3 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 32 MB | 65 W | 88 W | $329 |
Ryzen 5 7600X | 6C / 12T | 4.7 GHz | 5.3 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 32 MB | 105 W | 142 W | $299 |
Ryzen 5 7600 | 6C / 12T | 3.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz | DDR5-5200 | 32 MB | 65 W | 88 W | $229 |
Beginning with the highest 65 W SKU from AMD, the Ryzen 9 7900 has twelve Zen 4 cores with a most enhance clock velocity of as much as 5.4 GHz. As well as, it shares the identical 64 MB L3 cache because the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 9 7900X, however with a TDP over 100 Watts decrease than the flagship mannequin. The Ryzen 9 7900 is designed for content material creators, avid gamers, and fans searching for a extra reasonably priced choice.
Straight evaluating the Ryzen 9 7900 to the Ryzen 9 7900X, the 65 W variant has a base clock velocity of three.6 GHz, which is a drop of round 23% in comparison with its X-series sibling. However, the enhance clock speeds are rather more comparable, with a 5.4 GHz enhance frequency on the Ryzen 9 7900, making issues extra palatable for fans.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 12-core/24-thread processor in CPU-Z
The 61% drop in TDP between the Ryzen 9 7900 (65 W) and Ryzen 9 7900X (170 W) could pose some questions surrounding uncooked efficiency throughput. Definitely, the 7900 goes to see decrease efficiency in closely multi-threaded workloads; you continue to want lots of energy to mild up a dozen Zen 4 cores at 5GHz+. The up facet to this, nevertheless? Having a decrease TDP makes it extra viable in methods with house constraints. Not solely this, nevertheless it additionally means it is simpler to chill and alleviates some finances wanted for buying a high-end cooler, which might be spent on sooner DDR5 reminiscence, storage, or discrete graphics.
Shifting down the stack to the Ryzen 7 sequence, the Ryzen 7 7700 has the identical core and thread rely as the present Ryzen 7 7700X, however with a 100 MHz hit to spice up clock speeds. In the meantime there’s the base frequency of three.6 GHz, which does represent a drop in uncooked frequency of 900 MHz. Different options embrace a complete cache of 40 MB, 32 MB of L3 cache, and eight MB of L2 cache.
Total, the Ryzen 7 7700 sees a 40 W drop in TDP versus its 105 TDP of its X-series counterpart, which is notably smaller than the drop on the 7900 components. So the Zen 4 {hardware} is not being requested to surrender fairly as a lot efficiency headroom right here.
Slide from AMD’s Ryzen 7000 65 W Slide Deck: Efficiency-Per-Watt is the main focus
The ultimate SKU from AMD’s Ryzen 7000 65 W choices is the Ryzen 5 7600. The Ryzen 5 7600 is the entry-level mannequin of AMD’s newest high-performance AM5 platform, with six cores and a most enhance clock velocity of 5.1 GHz. It shares lots of the traits of the Ryzen 5 7600X, together with 32 MB of L3 cache with 6 MB of L2 cache; that is 1 MB per core which is a good thing about Zen 4 over the 512 KB of L2 cache per core on Zen 3. The opposite profit is the worth, of which the Ryzen 5 7600 could be very engaging, with an entry-level value of $229, down from the $299 MSRP (and $269 avenue value) of the 7600X. This enables customers seeking to go for a Zen 4 and TSMC 5 nm processor an much more reasonably priced choice to contemplate choosing.
Like the remainder of the Ryzen 7000 household, all three of the brand new 65 W SKUs additionally embrace an built-in GPU product of two RDNA2-based CUs, to be able to present primary ranges of built-in graphics. Whereas greater than passable for easy desktop wants, these should not be confused with having the identical ranges of graphical energy as their Ryzen sequence of APUs.
Lastly, it is also value reminding everybody that, as has been the case for a number of processor generations now, TDP is just not the utmost energy consumption worth for both AMD or Intel – neither is the definition of TDP even equivalent between the 2. For AMD, the metric to observe is Package deal Energy Monitoring (PPT), which is the ability degree that the CPU socket permits the CPU to attract by way of energy. On the AM5 platform, AMD defines PPT as being 1.35x the TDP – so within the case of right now’s 65 W Ryzen processors, meaning an 88 W socket energy restrict.
Take a look at Mattress and Setup
Per our processor testing coverage, we take a premium class motherboard appropriate for the socket and equip the system with an acceptable quantity of reminiscence working on the producer’s most supported frequency. That is additionally usually run at JEDEC sub-timings the place doable. It’s famous that some customers will not be eager on this coverage, stating that typically the utmost supported frequency is comparatively low, or sooner reminiscence is out there at an analogous value, or that the JEDEC speeds will be prohibitive for efficiency.
Whereas these feedback make sense, finally, only a few customers apply reminiscence profiles (both XMP or different) as they require interplay with the BIOS. Most customers will fall again on JEDEC-supported speeds – this contains house customers and trade who may wish to shave off a cent or two from the associated fee or keep inside the margins set by the producer. The place doable, we are going to prolong out testing to incorporate sooner reminiscence modules both similtaneously the evaluate or at a later date.
The Present CPU Take a look at Suite
For our AMD Ryzen 9 7900, Ryzen 7 7700, and Ryzen 5 7600 testing, we’re utilizing the next take a look at system:
AMD Ryzen 7000 Collection System (DDR5) | |
CPU | Ryzen 9 7900 ($429) 12 Cores, 24 Threads 65 W TDP Ryzen 7 7700 ($329) Ryzen 5 7600 ($229) |
Motherboard | GIGABYTE X670E Aorus Grasp (BIOS 813b) |
Reminiscence | G.Ability Trident Z5 Neo 2×16 GB DDR5-5200 CL44 |
Cooling | EK-AIO Elite 360 D-RGB 360 mm AIO |
Storage | SK Hynix 2TB Platinum P41 PCIe 4.0 x4 NMve |
Energy Provide | Corsair HX1000 |
GPUs | AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, Driver 31.0.12019 |
Working Techniques | Home windows 11 22H2 |
Our up to date CPU suite for 2023 contains numerous benchmarks, checks, and workloads designed to point out variance in efficiency between completely different processors and architectures. These embrace UL’s newest Procyon suite with each workplace and photograph modifying workloads simulated to measure efficiency in these duties, CineBench R23, Dwarf Fortress, Blender 3.3, and C-Ray 1.1.
In the meantime, we have additionally carried over some older (however nonetheless related/enlightening) benchmarks from our CPU 2021 suite. This contains benchmarks reminiscent of Dwarf Fortress, Factorio, and Dr. Ian Cutress’s 3DPMv2 benchmark.
We have now additionally up to date our pool of video games going ahead into 2023 and past, together with the most recent F1 2022 racing sport, the CPU-intensive RTS Whole Warfare: Warhammer 3, and the favored Hitman 3.